Burke to return most of war chest to
donors
Unopposed in primary, justice will empty
coffers
By Michael Higgins |
Tribune reporter
- January 21, 2008
In an unusual move, Illinois Supreme Court Justice Anne
Burke's campaign will return most of her $1.5 million war
chest to contributors.
Burke campaign officials said Friday that many of the
contributions came in before donors knew she would be
running unopposed for the high court in the Feb. 5
Democratic primary.
"This could have been an extremely costly race if she had an
opponent," said attorney John B. Simon, chairman of Burke's
campaign committee. "When that didn't materialize...she
thought it was appropriate for this money to be returned."
Burke's campaign, however, plans to spend an unspecified
amount on an advertising campaign on behalf of all of the
Democratic judicial candidates slated by the party to run in
Cook County, Simon said.
Burke's husband, powerful Chicago Ald. Ed Burke (14th),
is chairman of the judicial slating committees of the
county's Democratic Party.
Anne Burke was appointed to the state Supreme Court after
Justice Mary Ann McMorrow retired in July 2006.
Burke campaign officials said she raised about $1.7 million
in the last year. State filings for the first half of 2007
showed contributions from a parade of legal and business
heavyweights. Contributions for the second half of 2007
haven't yet been made public.
The records for the first half of 2007 show that John
Canning Jr., chairman of Madison Dearborn Partners LLC,
contributed $50,000 to Burke, while Arlington Park chairman
Richard Duchossois, his family and company gave $30,000.
Former U.S. Atty. Dan Webb donated $25,000 to Burke, and his
fellow Winston & Strawn attorneys added at least another
$19,250.
Bulls and White Sox owner Jerry Reinsdorf chipped in
$10,000, and a half-dozen members of the Pritzker family
contributed $1,000 each.
Politicians sometimes return individual donations to avoid a
scandal but rarely send back donations in bulk, said Kent
Redfield, a political science professor at the University of
Illinois at Springfield.
"I am hard-pressed to think of a similar situation,"
Redfield said. "It is really unusual for people to return
campaign contributions to the donors, unless the donors are
under indictment."
Instead, politicians with extra money usually transfer it to
other candidates or perhaps donate it to charity, Redfield
said.
After the campaign pays a share of the advertising campaign
for the Democratic-slated judicial candidates, two-thirds of
what remains would be returned to Burke's contributors,
Simon said.
The remaining one-third would be kept for any expenses in
the months leading up to the general election, Simon said,
but if Burke faces no opposition then, that money would be
returned to contributors too, Simon said.
No Republican has announced for the race.
Simon said the campaign stopped seeking donations in
November and turned previously scheduled fundraisers into
"meet and greet" events.
Under ethics rules, judicial candidates are not supposed to
know who donates to their campaigns, even though the
information is publicly available at the Illinois State
Board of Elections' Web site.
Burke meets people at receptions, Simon said, but "she does
not know who gave her money and she does not know what they
gave."
mjhiggins@tribune.com